Nonthaburi, Thailand – A 40-year-old man surrendered to investigators this morning, facing accusations of assaulting and raping a 36-year-old woman. Samrit, also known as “Suea Dusit,” was brought before the court for a bail hearing after police requested an arrest warrant, which was subsequently denied.
Wie und wann er sich stellte
According to police, Samrit presented himself at the Bang Kruai Police Station in Nonthaburi Province on June 6, 2026, at 10:00 AM. Investigators are pursuing the case in connection with the alleged battery of a 36-year-old woman identified as Mira. Authorities proceeded with further legal steps, including requesting an arrest warrant from the Nonthaburi Provincial Court.
Welche Vorwürfe erhoben werden
Investigators stated that Samrit is accused of rape, with allegations including the use of coercion, threats, and violence. The charges also emphasize that the victim was allegedly unable to resist or was deceived. Additionally, a complaint for battery is pending, as the victim reportedly suffered physical or psychological harm as a result of the alleged actions, according to the police.
Haftbefehl beantragt
The police officially submitted a request for an arrest warrant to the court on June 5, 2026, with the application number cited as 806/2026. Officers from the Bang Kruai Police Station and the Nonthaburi Provincial Court were responsible for this process. The purpose of the arrest warrant, according to investigators, was to apprehend the suspect and facilitate the ongoing collection of evidence.
Medienkonfrontation am Abtransport
Upon exiting the holding cell, Samrit reacted irritably to journalists present, exclaiming, “Stop filming, don’t you have any other news?” During his transport to the court, police reported that he remained expressionless and refused to answer questions regarding the accusations or the circumstances of the alleged incidents.
Vorläufige Haft und Kautionsablehnung
Police officers then escorted Samrit for his appearance at the Nonthaburi Provincial Court, where he was taken into custody. The court appearance was intended to determine his further detention status. The investigators recommended against granting bail, citing the potential for a high penalty and the ongoing need to gather evidence.